The CIA puts anti-feminist brainwashing in Nickelodeon TV shows for kids.

So this is what an average American family disappointed with Nickelodeon sexism might look like.

Was the CIA putting in-plain-sight “subliminal” messages into Nickelodeon TV shows, in the early 2010s, to try to roll back feminism’s gains by brainwashing kids into accepting casual sexism again? I say, Yes it was — and I am going to prove this to you. Is it still doing it? You decide! So read on to learn all about this disgraceful and very harmful phenomenon in American popular culture.

So like, I was viewing The Haunted Hathaways on Nickelodeon recently… it was this episode, “Haunted Cookie Jar”… and the older boy, Miles, who normally seems really sweet and gentle, out of nowhere gets angry at the youngest girl Frankie — saying to her, angrily, “NOW WOMAN!!!” (like, as in, move your butt over there immediately you inferior subhuman member of a slave caste). The Frankie character then runs away to the place Miles pointed at, seemingly in fear of him… and also seemingly because she was ordered to do it, and she sorta “unquestioningly obeyed the man when he raised his voice”, for some reason!!!?

I was like, What. The. Fuck. Seriously. What the fuck? For some reason the little boy was written to order the girl around like a white man ordering a black “boy” around in pre-civil war America or whatever — and Nickelodeon corporate OKed this scene to go into the final version of the episode, in 2013. I was incensed. So angry about this! Actually kinda in shock for a while, trying to understand why something like this can have happened in 2013 when I thought that things had improved so much for us girls and women at that point in time, that something like this was never in a million years going to happen on a mainstream kids’ TV show in America. So I paused the episode for a long time, then eventually decided to not view the end of it in protest.

Update: I took the steps of personally contacting my cable TV provider, Virgin Media, on the phone and with a text reply to the automated “How did our customer service assistant do? Rate their helpfulness, and reply with any comments you have” thing. Using both methods, I like explained at length — referring only to the essential information though — why The Haunted Hathaways needs to be withdrawn from being aired by Virgin Media immediately. I explained which two episodes it is that contain the unacceptably sexist stuff… and I DEMANDED that Virgin Media’s head office, board of directors or whatever, hears about this important issue immediately! I also DEMANDED that Virgin Media does actually stop showing The Haunted Hathaways effective immediately, and also like strongly chose to demand that Virgin Media apologises publicly to all girls and women for missing this disgusting blatant sexist bigotry on one of its TV shows — and I demanded too that Virgin Media actually goes as far as suspending all of Virgin Media’s Nickelodeon programming effective immediately pending a review by both Virgin Media and Nickelodeon of Nickelodeon’s own current output (to make sure that it doesn’t contain any other unacceptable sexist bigotry that “they somehow didn’t notice”, and like… to make sure that this never happens again!!!!) I also said that Virgin Media has to contact me personally by phone, letter, or email, to reassure me that all of these things are definitely going to happen — or I’m gonna contact the feminist press for comment, with an eye to setting feminist attack dogs against both Virgin Media and Nickelodeon, basically. No offence to the feminist press and fellow feminist activists, who I love and appreciate a ton. I’m sure you understand that you gotta scare corporate types with the feminist activist boogeywoman, and the “attack dogs” characterization is only mentioned here to help people understand the sort of things I said using different words, in an extended conversation with Virgin Media. 🙂 I suggest that everyone concerned by the issues that I’m bringing to your attention here does the same sort of thing as me! Also, I was careful to put in my text reply to the automated survey, the phrase “Virgin Media’s Nickelodeon programming”, to suggest the idea of brand confusion (i.e. that people are gonna think Virgin Media is directly responsible for the unacceptable sexism, and maybe Virgin Media is making the TV shows itself). 🙂 I once had a letter printed by The Guardian, back when I thought Freemasonry might actually be very important (it was during the Westminster Freemasonry lodge story, around 2016 I think: I strongly criticized Freemasonry in the letter). I know my letter was in a printed paper edition of The Observer or The Guardian. They never printed my “nom de plume”, The Goddess Athena, LOL! I wanted to mention this when I contacted Virgin Media, but I forgot! LOL! I thought that might have really gotten them to listen though, if I’d said that. I think I said more than enough though!!!! I was gonna simply say that The Guardian once printed a letter of mine, and that’s all I was gonna say. I deliberately chose not to mention Freemasonry to Virgin Media because I felt it wasn’t the essential information and I needed to be concise — avoid prejudices against “conspiracy theorists” that might stop people listening to me quickly, etc — but I’m not sure if other people ought to do the same as me there. It’s obviously your choice how much you say about the CIA fake Freemasonry brainwashing aspect of this, if you wanna do your bit to help. I think some people ought to mention it, to try to gradually get “authorities” to take this sort of thing seriously instead of automatically switch off and stop listening when anyone discusses this real and serious stuff.

Eventually, I also decided to not view anymore of whole The Haunted Hathaways show, in protest… even though I like the Taylor character and the mom character a lot!!!! Seriously, I was enjoying viewing this series and I had lots more episodes left to view — but I feel very strongly that us girls have to take some kind of action when we find ourselves getting treated like this. I.e. if it’s like you’re enjoying something but you know you have to eat shit to enjoy it, because there’s something sexist and nasty going on underneath, then don’t just accept it! Loudly point out the sexism. Loudly demand that it stops. And actually refuse to participate in non-essential things that are sexist… and like, loudly explain why you’re not participating anymore!!!! Because that’s what changes things, and you’re gonna be happier in the long run when the world gets better. Viewing more episodes of The Haunted Hathaways wasn’t gonna make me THAT happy in the long run. But I liked this show. 🙁

The series was helping me a lot with my PTSD issues (me being triggered by men on TV and in movies… all men and boys, basically… resulting in me wanting to reject all TV shows and movies that have lots of men and boys in them). Obviously that’s been making things pretty difficult for me viewing TV and movies, but I just felt like I didn’t want anything to do with men and boys in my entertainment media… when I’m not, like, doing my shopping or whatever and I have to interact with them. I started viewing a lot of kids’ TV shows and animes from Japan. Anyway — this was making things unnecessarily difficult for me and I wanted to change it… so for a long time now I’ve been doing self-directed exposure therapy to entertainment media that’s more about men and boys than I used to feel able to cope with. Viewing The Haunted Hathaways was supposed to be part of that, and it was helping me a lot until this seemingly sweet kid (Miles) treats a girl like she’s his slave housewife from a previous century. I actually sort of liked the Miles character too, because I have PTSD that comes from my experiences with men, and I found the character unthreatening and pretty likeable (similar to the dad character, who I also find unthreatening and sort of likeable). So I know this might seem ridiculous, but at first I found the Louie character a little challenging because the child actor looks like he’s gonna grow up into a scary big man and he does a lot of aggressive posturing, LOL! That’s because of my PTSD though. The more I viewed the programme, the more I found him to be OK and a nice-seeming kid character who isn’t doing anything to hurt anyone, and gets along with the little girl Frankie as equals. So yeah.

Like the only reason I was able to think of that made any sense, for why this scene exists, is the CIA (or some other network of private agents, not Freemasons LOL) trying to brainwash a couple of generations of kids into accepting casual sexism again!!! Because it’s not only this whole Haunted Hathaways show that’s a problem (the Miles character says “woman” the same way again to Taylor, a girl much older than Frankie, FFS!)… iCarly is also totally 100% terrible for feminism, for a ton of reasons. And the iCarly show was being made at the same time The Haunted Hathaways was being made, in the early 2010s. One of the gross running themes of iCarly is the Freddie character “being in love” with Carly for a long time, even though she keeps rejecting him over and over. But eventually the character is rewarded by getting “dates” and/or kisses with Carly (AND WITH SAM!!!! A character who explicitly hates Freddie so much that she’s constantly beating him up throughout the series… like, to a ridiculous extent. She beats him up SO MUCH that it seems like a pretty clear cut attempt from the CIA or whoever to light a fire underneath a generation of American boys, to make them feel as if “boys don’t matter anymore” and “the world is unfair to boys now, and it’s girls who get unfair special treatment from society now”… even though that’s soooo wrong in a million ways, especially as iCarly was being produced long before even the Harvey Weinstein sexual assaults story broke in the media, nevermind the Epstein sex trafficking of minor girls as sex slaves to the rich and powerful basically. Anyway — I refused to view any of the episodes that are about Freddie getting together with Carly and/or Sam, after both of them VERY CLEARLY rejected him as a suitor AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN on the show… because I felt it was so wrong for boys to be sent that message: that if they sexually harrass girls often enough, eventually the girls are gonna give in and “date” them or kiss them, or whatever. (In the case of Freddie and Sam getting together, the very bad and wrong idea that “girls pretend to hate boys they actually have secret crushes on” is used as the reason why Sam relents and actually gets with him, completely out of character!!!!)

Both iCarly and The Haunted Hathaways have seriously lame “Freemason” symbols on their shows — put there, I guess, by the CIA (or whoever) to try to convince the public that Freemasons, like, run everything. To misdirect people away from simple corporate shareholders with a lot of shares in the biggest companies, and inbred trust fund people that inherited a lot of money and use it to fund creepy secret networks of agents to advance their interests… which might be as disappointingly simple as being able to keep fucking “the best whores”, including child sex slaves (not whores) for those of them that like them young. For some reason I feel like these people’s interests are like totally against my interests LOL. So I’ve been exposing them on the internet since 2016.

Anyway people… iCarly has this dumb “G” symbol burger restaurant or something, and The Haunted Hathaways has a pie shop with a black and white checkerboard floor. The “G” thing and the checkerboard are both symbols important in Freemasonry, but I guess a lot of you might know that already. A lot of people — like me — read all about Freemasonry in their obsessive conspiracy researcher phases… so the CIA (or whoever) totally play on people’s knowledge of dumb Freemason conspiracy stuff to try to make it seem like Freemasons are in control of everything, putting their symbols everywhere (including on Supreme Court buildings and seriously retarded stuff like that… not just iCarly, LOL!!!!) They’ve been trying to convince everyone that Freemasons (or the “Vatican secret societies”, LOL) run everything behind the scenes, and they’ve been trying to convince everyone of this dumb idea since they pretended that Freemasons took over the whole Italian government in that “Propaganda Due” psyop that was supposed to seem “too big and too reported on in the media to be a totally dumb CIA lie”. Basically, the corporate shareholders and inbred trust fund people have “think tanks” and computers that are always coming up with projected models of the future and stuff. They’ve known since the US military was developing that Arpanet thing or whatever (the thing that later became the early internet in the USA), that the internet becoming widely available for the whole public to use in the 1990s was gonna result in investigative journalists and conspiracy researchers figuring out exactly which corporate shareholders and inbred trust fund people actually “ran things behind the scenes”. So the HUGE Propaganda Due psyop (i.e. HUGE orchestrated CIA lie) and all of this retarded literature about Freemasonry, Vatican secret societies, lizard people, and a trillion other narratives like that got produced by the CIA to confuse the public and misdirect them away from the “real people behind the scenes”. The Propaganda Due thing was so huge and intricately orchestrated, involving a whole country like Italy that was already a total mess anyway (always changing governments constantly with no stability or trust in government to actually lose by doing this)… this retarded CIA gigantic lie was carried out by them, to like well and truly convince the journalists and public that the “Freemasons and Vatican mafia secretly controlling everything” thing had to be at least partly true. It’s soooo dumb. So. Dumb.

So that’s why iCarly and The Haunted Hathaways have “G” symbols and black and white checkerboard floors in them, so prominently. To intimidate the people, basically. To try to convince us that there’s no point in fighting against the corporate shareholders and inbred trust fund people, by making it seem like it’s not even them doing this dumb stuff and it’s actually a super-secret Freemasonry organisation that “got exposed in Italy and South America once, but is obviously in control behind the scenes everywhere else and never got exposed in all those places because it’s THAT SCARY AND POWERFUL” (LOL, when that’s not true at all, and Propaganda Due actually completely failed to take over Italy even in the dumb CIA gigantic orchestrated lie, proving the Freemasons and the Vatican are a total failure at controlling things… not that they control everything everywhere else, in secret!!!! Like, WTF!!!!? Why does Propaganda Due FAILING, and being like ARRESTED AND JAILED, mean that Freemasons are powerful and effective? Just because Gelli got released from jail, and before that was able to escape at one point, after like running away from Italy like a total loser because his organisation failed and he was hunted by law enforcement? LOL?!

I wonder why rich men’s groups felt the need to place all of these nasty anti-feminist themes into kids’ TV shows like The Haunted Hathaways and iCarly, targeting impressionable little kids that look to characters on shows like this for guidance on how to be girls and how to be boys! Targeting the generations of little kids that are gonna grow up to be the feminist or anti-feminist adults of the future, with their constant repeats of these same TV shows on the Nickelodeon channel which is shown all across the USA and in Britain! Were the secretive corporate shareholders pulling the strings of the CIA like worried that feminism was gonna cancel their “right” to have sex with underage sex slaves, and like mess with the quality and quantity of their whores in their whorehouses in every city they fly to? Were they like worried that maybe not enough women were gonna want to be their whores anymore, if feminism kept getting stronger and stronger, out of their “control”? Were they maybe worried that their child sex slave trafficking operations might get legitimately busted and shut down for good? People like the inbred trust fund guy Robert H Richards III, fucking his little baby relative and getting away with it, thanks to a Biden man? Because this is like the sort of stupid self-destructive scum that pull the strings of the CIA and other groups. People with too much money, no morals at all, and obsessed with protecting their “interests” using networks of compromised individuals (which includes protecting their whorehouses in every major city, and protecting their supply of good quality whores). Basically a kind of super-mafia behind the biggest private companies of the Western World.

What I want to know is WHY IS THE HAUNTED HATHAWAYS EVEN STILL BEING SHOWN ON TV IN 2023, POST WEINSTEIN BEING JAILED AND EVERYTHING THAT FEMINISM HAS ACHIEVED FOR US GIRLS AND WOMEN???? Like, why is this show been repeated every year on Nickelodeon since 2014 or whenever it started, even though the little boy character Miles refers to two different girls as “woman” in a clearly sexist and minimising way?!?!! One of the girls Miles calls “woman” like this is actually older than him, FFS!!!! Why the fuck is this show still on TV? Not even the offending episodes have been pulled. WHY???? This is not OK. Like I said — there is no way that either of the two girl characters can get away with calling him “boy” like from a previous racist century, so how does he get away with calling them “woman”? Does anyone think that the offending episodes are still gonna be on TV in 2023 if it was the other way around, and they called him “boy” in a clearly racially motivated way? Surely the whole series is gonna have been pulled from TV forever if that happened. WTF????

When are we (girls and women) gonna stop silently viewing ourselves as basically inferior as a starting position, and so naturally accepting of less improvement as a NON-MINORITY GROUP than minority groups do in nations in which they’re not the majority?!!!! When are we gonna demand the same amount of change happens for our girls and women group that the black people group (that includes girls and women) rightfully demands happens for them, as quickly as black people demand that it changes? WHEN ARE WE GOING TO DEMAND THAT OUR RIGHTS MATTER TOO? Like, when are we gonna demand the amount of improvement that a MAN demands “as a human with rights”, instead of the amount of improvement that we demand “for a girl”, or “for a woman”?! You know?!!!! When are we not gonna accept being like the harem princesses of whatever male group we’re attached to in society, accepting as many rights as “our” male group allows us to have (in recognition of the status of “our” male group compared to other male groups, and not because of OUR STATUS and OUR RIGHTS as GIRLS AND WOMEN!!!!?) This is a pretty shitty way of thinking about it that’s obviously not completely or even very much true at all — but it is partly true, I think, and that’s our fault for accepting less because of thinking we’re inferior to start with. We’re “just girls”. “Just women”. And even if we ARE inferior in some ways, like being smaller and stuff in overall statistical ways specifically… that DOESN’T MEAN WE OUGHT TO ACCEPT LESS RIGHTS COMPARED TO OTHER INTEREST GROUPS!!!! THE POINT OF CIVILISATION AND THE RIGHTS OF LESS ADVANTAGED PEOPLE IS THAT WE GET THE SAME RIGHTS. So we have to demand the same rights. We have to demand as much as everyone else gets even though we’re smaller, because we have civilisation and they’re not gonna kill us all or rape us all for demanding the same as what they get. Look at what happened in Iceland in their 1970s feminism movement, when all the women in the country refused to go to work, cook, or do any childcare for a whole shade (my word for day). The women and girls of Iceland got more rights. They got the first democratically elected female president in the world. Iceland has pretty much exactly 50/50 female and male lawmakers in their parliament!!!! The same amount of female members of parliament as male members of parliament!!!! Sweden — another extremely (notoriously to some people?) feminist country — has almost 50/50 female and male lawmakers too… and THAT’S WHAT DEMANDING MORE DOES FOR YOU!!!! That’s what saying “give us the EXACT SAME RIGHTS… not something almost as good, or just something better than before”… that’s what demanding MORE gets us!!!! More, not less, you know? If we don’t put ourselves first then no one else is gonna do that, ever.

So like, speaking to female readers of my blog, please do at least one thing like I did when I refused to view the rest of The Haunted Hathaways (even though I enjoyed it) because it’s too sexist to justifiably continue supporting without being a gender traitor, basically. And please do what I did, which is loudly and clearly explain why I did this: to get us girls and women the exact same rights as boys and men. To make sure I’m not pathetically accepting less from male people just because I’m smaller than they are, knowing that the world is only gonna change if I don’t eat shit when eating shit is all that’s on offer at that moment.

There were other issues with The Haunted Hathaways that I knew about, and maybe I ought to have rejected the show sooner. Brec Bassinger (who plays Stargirl) plays a minor role on the show, and her character Emma is a huge insult to all girls and women. I mean, especially insulting to girls like me actually, because she plays a “dumb blonde” stereotype that isn’t even funny. Seriously, none of her lines are funny because, like, they’re not supposed to be. Like, having viewed the other episodes with Miles talking to girls in a sexist way, I’m sure that the Emma character was written that way by the CIA (or whoever) SPECIFICALLY TO SEE HOW MUCH THEY COULD GET AWAY WITH, IN PLAIN SIGHT, TRYING TO BRAINWASH A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS OF KIDS TO TRY TO ROLL BACK FEMINISM’S GAINS ON BEHALF OF ELITE MEN’S GROUPS. I found the character hurtful and upsetting, and I knew that it wasn’t even funny at all… so I was like, “eating shit”, accepting girls like me being insulted… because it was only girls like me being insulted, and not all girls and women being insulted. It was wrong of me to accept the show up to that point when it was blatantly insulting ME, and all girls like me — but the CIA and organisations like that always try to disguise what they’re doing with their plausibly deniable narratives for why it’s like that (in this case, using the fact that people prefer to assume the best instead of the worst, when they don’t wanna stop viewing a TV show… and using the fact that it’s completely possible for writers to write lame, unfunny jokes that lazily insult “dumb blondes” without it being a conspiracy: so that’s the CIA’s plausibly deniable narrative for why Emma is like that). I ought to know better though, because I’ve seen iCarly (LOL).

It’s not just iCarly either. The CIA does all of this stuff for the rich men’s groups (remember: it’s NOT Freemasonry behind this)… they put a ton of other anti-feminism themes into Nickelodeon TV shows, that are in plain sight, surrounded by all the pro-feminism themes that they can’t stop people writing onto Nickelodeon shows because that’s the way American culture is now. That’s just what people do when they’re not a secret agent infiltrating Nickelodeon corporate, or when they’re not put onto the writing/production team by a secret agent in Nickelodeon corporate specifically to write these crappy anti-feminism scenes. Everyone else is just trying to make money, and if they’re making political points with their writing, it’s probably gonna be good for feminism, etc. At the moment, feminism makes money for Nickelodeon. 🙂 This is a good thing. If feminism didn’t make money for Nickelodeon, it’s not gonna be constantly repeating shows like The Thundermans, and having 50/50 female and male child characters with superpowers on the successor show to Henry Danger (Danger Force). I never viewed Danger Force myself, but I was happy about seeing the girls on the adverts for it!

So, the important thing to understand, is like, the CIA has to look at things long-term when it’s trying to roll back feminism, working for these corrupt rich men’s groups who are trying to keep their Epstein/Weinstein whorehouses running (when they can see feminism coming for them, about to take away their rights to treat women as nothing but disposable whore pieces of meat, in secret, away from public eyes). The CIA can’t attack feminism too openly, so that’s what the anti-feminism stuff on The Haunted Hathaways was about. Kids’ TV is a good place for the CIA to try to brainwash future generations of people to be against feminism, because adults don’t care that much about kids’ shows so they aren’t being scrutinised very hard by adults. Nickelodeon shows are stuffed full of zany, crazy, over the top nonsense… and this “TOTALLY CRAZY AND FUN kids’ TV genre” helps to hide the CIA’s brainwashing (they hope their brainwashing gets lost with all the zany nonsense, so people don’t notice it — or if parents do notice it when viewing with their kids, that they explain it away as being “not important to society’s future”, or “more bad/stupid writing as usual and probably not deliberately anti-feminist, so they won’t keep doing it: no reason to complain I guess”).

But there is a reason to complain about this. It is important to society’s future. And that’s because kids are like, simple, in the way they think (especially very little kids). Kids look to things like the characters on Nickelodeon TV shows to help them understand how to behave: how to be a girl, or how to be a boy, or whatever! If a little girl sees the Taylor and Frankie characters on The Haunted Hathaways meekly accepting the Miles character calling them “woman” and ordering them around like they’re beneath him in some hierarchy of authority, just because he’s male, then the little girl is maybe gonna internalise that idea that being a girl means accepting more shit from people than boys do (and maybe she’s gonna internalise the idea of being automatically below boys in a hierarchy of authority, since even Taylor accepts being angrily called “woman” by Miles… even though Taylor is several years senior to Miles, who is just a little boy compared to her). And EVEN THOUGH the little girl is gonna see lots more examples of female characters who DO strongly challenge being treated in a sexist way, on television, in 2023 — remember she’s still a little girl who thinks about stuff in a simple way, so instead of those other examples cancelling out the idea of girls automatically being below boys in a hierarchy of authority, regardless of age, she might instead think that girls are SOMETIMES below boys in a hierarchy of authority, regardless of age (with there being no explanation for why things are sometimes like that). Adults look at stuff differently, so they might assume that one VERY BAD AND TERRIBLE example of a girl being treated the way that Miles treats Taylor and Frankie on The Haunted Hathaways being seen by a ridiculously large number of girls every year since 2014 isn’t that important. But it is important! It’s really, really important!!!! That’s why The Haunted Hathaways needs to be pulled from TV by Nickelodeon immediately and never shown again. The whole series needs to be pulled, because it’s that serious. It’s a disgrace. It stinks!

They are trying to see how much they can get away with in plain sight, to test the waters. If they got away with it, they keep the show on TV, to see HOW LONG they can get away with it. The show is still being repeated and it needs to be pulled from TV, because it’s sexist to a completely unacceptable degree in 2023. It’s not an accident that it’s still on TV either, because don’t think that a huge business operation like Nickelodeon doesn’t involve people constantly reviewing their programming — and the actual content of the programming, meaning employees having to view the TV shows again each year (at least) to see what they’re like — so that means SOMEONE IS MAKING THE DECISION EVERY YEAR AT NICKELODEON TO KEEP THIS SEXIST SHOW ON THE AIR, EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW IT’S UNACCEPTABLY SEXIST AT THIS POINT. The only explanation for why they’re making this same decision every year is because it’s a CIA agent doing it, on behalf of the rich men’s groups. They want to brainwash kids to be anti-feminist as much as they can get away with doing this, for as long as they can get away with doing this… to try to take away our rights in the future. They are literally trying to take our hard-won rights away from us again, and you can see the evidence that this is happening if you view the TV shows I’ve talked about. It’s not a joke. We have to do more. We have to demand more, as girls and women.

Nickelodeon, I’m saying to you, STOP SHOWING THE HAUNTED HATHAWAYS because it’s unacceptably sexist in 2023!!!!

Also, I think there ought to be all-women candidate lists for the next US Presidential election, to make sure that we get a female United States President. We need to call for things like this to happen, even if it seems extreme, because extreme situations require extreme action to correct inequalities like this. Like what happened in Iceland with women refusing to go to work and refusing to do any childcare (the type of extreme action that helped Iceland’s women to win their first elected female president before the rest of the world), and like what happens in Sweden. I’m in England, so I can’t vote in the US elections, but that’s not the point. The USA calls itself the “leader of the free world” — and that’s a fucking joke when it hasn’t even had a woman president yet. I think it’s disgusting. I’m disgusted with the USA for acting like its women and girls have the same rights, when it’s never had a woman leader, and so many countries around the world have! It’s like, a total disgrace.

So here is another example of this bullshit the CIA have been pulling, using Nickelodeon kids’ shows, to like try to brainwash little girls into becoming more submissive to men when they grow up… to try to roll back feminism in the future on behalf of rich men who don’t like the way society is going. The Thundermans. Now I’m totally going to explain exactly what is wrong with The Thundermans, and how totally bad and terrible it is, LOL! But first I’m going to totally say a few nice things about this show that I actually love a lot.

The Thundermans is a very cool and special show, because it’s about a family of superheroines and superheroes — and the girls often (but not always) seem like they’re actually better and more effective than the boys at using their powers, and fighting crime and stuff. And when the Chloe character arrived on the show, it meant that the Thundermans family actually had more girls than boys!!!! Four girls and only three boys! A pretty special thing for a TV show like that, even in this era of TV still. 🙂 It used to be that girls with superpowers were very rare characters in popular culture, just like it was with the small number of action women characters that there used to be compared to all the Rambos and John Waynes. And TV shows for girls used to be pretty much exclusively written to prepare girls for being submissive housewives and mothers. The girls and women of The Thundermans are not much like the female characters of previous eras of TV and movies. The world sure has changed, you know? So I don’t want to depress female readers of my blog. I want to light a fire under you all, so that you do what you’ve gotta do to make sure that the rich men’s groups can never roll back feminism by brainwashing little kids bit by bit, over years and years, without you noticing it happening. I want to make sure that a woman President of the United States gets elected soon, and other things like that. To like, change the status quo forever, so it’s never gonna go back to how it used to be (which wasn’t THAT long ago, y’know).

So anyway. Even though The Thundermans is an awesome show for kids, and even though it seems like overall it’s much better for girls and women than it can possibly be bad for us… sigh… unfortunately, the CIA was able to use its agents at Nickelodeon corporate and on the writing team to have two episodes in which girl characters have proven that they’re good enough to win against male characters, but then deliberately give way to the male characters and let them win. It’s like they suddenly turn into submissive “good girls” for men, for seemingly no reason. Obviously, reading this post I’m making, you can now see that the reason why this happens is because of the CIA’s agents doing this crap on purpose for the reasons I already explained. 🙁 It sucks butt.

One of the episodes of The Thundermans in which this happens is “The Thunder Games, Part Two”. It’s like, especially sad that this happens, since that’s the final episode of The Thundermans series. 🙁 Basically, the two main characters, Phoebe and Max, have to compete against each other for a better job position at their superheroic workplace. There’s only one spot available on the “Z Force”, so “Dirk Trumbo” makes them literally fight each other in single combat. Phoebe actually wins the fight, because she uses her telekinesis better than Max to hold him floating in the air as if he’s a ragdoll that she can just toss out of the Sumo-like ring to win the combat. He looks totally defeated with puppy dog eyes. Then she has a personality crisis about not wanting to be the “mean” person who crushed her brother’s dreams and lets him win on purpose. (It’s not “mean” for a girl or woman to defeat a boy or man, when she’s better than he is.) He recovers while she is hesitating, and quickly tosses her out of the ring and wins. There was like no reason to have them fight each other like this, so that there was only one winner out of the girl and the boy — but they wrote this scene for the final episode. It’s one of those “I’m never gonna forgive this” things that I have stored in my mind now, LOL!

The other episode of The Thundermans in which this happens is “Back To School”. So in this episode, for some reason the dad character is called “President of the home” for no reason — and he’s in charge of everything that happens at the home of the superheroic family that the show is about. He decides who has to do what chores, etc. A pretty crappy idea of how division of labor between a husband and wife is supposed to work, huh? It’s basically reinforcing the patriarchal idea of a man being “head of the family”, in plain sight. Barbara, the wife and mother character, actually supports him being “President of the home”, and begs him not to let their daughter Nora challenge him for the Presidency in an impromptu leadership election. So like, Nora actually wins the election on merit until her own votes are counted, because she got more votes than him. She actually won, just like Phoebe actually won the single combat against Max in the final episode. But then when Nora’s own votes are read out, she voted for her dad instead of for herself to win “because she only wanted him to listen to her”. You can see the clear pattern here of trying to teach little kids that being a girl means giving way to boys and men, and letting them win. It’s probably disguised on purpose as a political commentary about Hillary and Obama, that only parents are gonna understand (maybe the plausibly deniable narrative for why the episodes are like this is that the writers wanted to say to girls “if you have chance to get a woman president or whatever, make sure that you vote for a woman, or vote for yourself metaphorically by making sure you win against men in any situation like competing for a promotion at work… don’t miss your chance girls!”) But the very little girls who view the show are only going to understand the idea that they’re supposed to lose on purpose to boys and men though, and that’s the point of it. The plausibly deniable narrative — that’s confusing, and only makes sense if you view both episodes — is only there to try to stop parents from complaining, by having them think they’re “smart” for noticing the “clever” political commentary. 🙁 The CIA is evil. They’re literally trying to keep women down using brainwashing on kids’ shows, even though that’s not the CIA’s job at all.

Some people are gonna say it must be Freemasons and not the CIA, because the CIA has women working for it, so how can the rich men’s groups convince the CIA to do all of these things against women’s interests? That’s dumb though, because there aren’t enough Freemasons to have them fill all of these job positions to do all of these things at corporate and writing teams for all of the companies in America’s entertainment industry. Some of the people doing this crap for the CIA are gonna be women, sadly… and I guess that’s just because it’s not hard to get people to do evil stuff for money. There was this whole anti-women master-slave sex cult in America’s TV industry featuring that Smallville actress. Somehow it was pretty easy to convince a whole bunch of high-status women to be pathetic masochistic whores for men, just for BDSM pleasure or something (not even for promotion in the TV industry, I think). I think it’s like pretty easy to get enough people of any gender to be agents of rich men’s groups, working against the interests of everyone else who isn’t in the rich men’s groups. It’s the CIA doing all of this, and even if Freemasons are used to do some things here and there as part of the wider network of influence and blackmailing of people to do stuff for the CIA — the “Freemasons control everything” theory is dumb, and it’s the boring big corporate shareholders who are the real people behind the scenes. The CIA is their main way of co-ordinating the network of influence and blackmailing, I think. So yeah. It’s the rich men’s groups and the CIA. Feminism has it right, basically. It’s the Patriarchy and Freemasonry is only a small and relatively unimportant part of that, besides the role Freemasonry plays as the official patsy of the CIA and the rich men’s groups (so that people get misdirected away from the real culprits).

The twin towers thing was me in 2021, because of an episode of the Melissa Benoist Supergirl TV show that upset me. And just in case anyone’s wondering, I don’t think she’s ever been in a sex cult (because mentioning the Smallville actress stuff and then her name, or even just “Supergirl”, might be confusing). Anyway — it’s not the Freemasons who are the real people behind the scenes. It’s just my fault that the rich men’s groups have had to say it’s the Freemasons even more than they were already doing before that, since I used to be convinced by the Propaganda Due CIA big lie… so when this thing happened on the TV show in a previous version of the universe, I like blamed the Freemasons and big corporate bankers (because whoever it was that did this thing, they literally said it was those specific people who did it). Also, it wasn’t planned. It wasn’t something I was able to help doing. You can read more about this on my other blog. I never uploaded any of my posts from my other blog, like I said I was going to do — and I don’t think I’m gonna do that now. I already said it all, so it seems like there’s no benefit to uploading the posts here too. I made my other blog easy to find though. So yeah.

The “Back To School” episode of The Thundermans is pretty cool, because it references a website I used to use to post my thoughts like this on the internet. Social Anxiety Support, or SAS for short. I used to post there as XebelRebel. In the episode of The Thundermans, the school that Phoebe and Max go back to is called SASS. 🙂 The little girl who creates rainclouds is supposed to represent me, LOL. Although I don’t like boys, since I’m lesbian. I like flying cars though!!!! 😀 Get it? It’s a clever code I put in the episode, since I’m Goda and I create everything in the universe with my mind. OBVIOUSLY the rainclouds, and the reference to making a rainbow, are there to say I’m REIGN. 🙂

I also responded to the episode of The Haunted Hathaways that upset me so much (Haunted Cookie Jar), in which Miles calls Frankie “woman” in a nasty sexist way, by putting lots of “hilarious” and obnoxiously obvious references to Freemasonry rituals into the episode of The Haunted Hathaways that I viewed next (“Haunted Brothers”, LOL! Even the name of the episode is a stupidly obvious reference to Freemasonry, haha!) As I’ve been explaining to you all, it’s not actually the Freemasons who are behind this dumb Nickelodeon attempted brainwashing of children to try to roll back feminism — it’s the rich men’s groups and their CIA traitors to all humanity agents who are behind it, actually — but anyone who like knows anything about Freemasonry, knows that they aren’t supposed to make it stupidly obvious to everyone that they’re Freemasons. It’s supposed to always be easily plausibly deniable when they do their intimidatory gang signs in public… which is why their hand signs and stuff are close enough to random things that lots of people do with their hands and clothes, so they can say “I was just fiddling with my coat, or grabbing my chin, or whatever! I wasn’t doing Freemason things! WTF! You’re crazy!!!!!” if anyone points out what they’re doing. Anyway, I used my mind to have this “Haunted Brothers” episode lampoon Freemasons with the actresses and actors “just happening to have been written to do a bunch of genuinely random non-malicious things that just happened to look extremely similar to Freemason rituals and stuff Freemasons do”. 🙂 They keep waving wands around like some of the dumbest Freemasons rituals that they do in their dumb lodge buildings. Temples, whatever, doofuses. There’s this scene with something that looks like an oversized Freemason ring. People “cut signs” like Freemasons do for the first three degrees of Freemasonry. I think someone gets raised up from the floor, like the third degree ritual or whatever. I can’t remember what degree it is anymore, because it’s a long time ago that I read all of these books about Freemasonry, LOL. It must be the third degree though I think. I remember that they call their buildings temples, but not everything. 😉 Seriously you’re not supposed to say this stuff in public so you can probably trust that I’m not a Freemason (since there are actually female Freemasons, although they say they’re not real “regular” Freemasons, blah blah whatever). LOL. I’m always anxious that people are gonna think I’m a Freemason when I say stuff like this, which I ought to remember not so many people are gonna think! But a lot of the general public might not understand how Freemasonry works and think that talking about it obviously is like saying you are a Freemason when the opposite is true, pretty much always. That’s why this episode is so funny, LOL. They’re supposed to intimidate people without ever making it too clear that they’re saying it’s Freemasons. I totally wrecked the CIA’s plausibly deniable narrative that it’s Freemasons running Nickelodeon by making this episode be called “Haunted Brothers” and by making all the people in the episode be constantly acting out all the Freemasons rituals I can remember. 🙂 Fuck you, CIA! LOL! I’m not gonna view the episode again, but there’s a ton of dumb Freemason stuff in it because of me… so you can all view it and have a good laugh at the CIA’s expense! CIA losers!!!!

If anyone’s wondering, I was so unhappy about feeling that I needed to stop viewing The Haunted Hathaways because of Miles’ nasty sexism in “Haunted Cookie Jar”, that I rebelled against myself and continued viewing the show for two more episodes. I didn’t want to have a kids’ show I was enjoying taken away from me, when it’s already hard enough for me to find TV shows I can comfortably view with my PTSD. I was kind of in denial about how serious it was, and how much I needed to stop viewing it to be a self-respecting girl and feminist. I like Taylor a lot because she’s a lot like Phoebe in The Thundermans, so it was hard to recognise that I needed to stop viewing it in protest. But the only two episodes I viewed after “Haunted Cookie Jar” were “Haunted Brothers” and “Haunted Camping”. I was unhappy with the awkward way that I said I’m Goda, and that I’m actually female, in these episodes (the warty school matron lady is supposed to represent me trying to scare people away from me by pretending to be “God” instead of Goda… trying to appear ugly and unattractive, when I’m actually an attractive girl). In “Haunted Camping” someone says “Mom, you’re good!” which is supposed to be understood as “Mom, you’re God(a)!” LOL. So like I hope people get a kick out of noticing these funny things I put into these episodes. I can’t remember exactly everything I put in the episodes, but you can have fun trying to figure it all out. Anyway, Miles called Taylor “woman” in the same angry way that he said it to Frankie, in “Haunted Camping” — so I was like, Victoria, you can’t respect yourself if you keep viewing this sexist show after him saying it a second time. So I stopped viewing it after that.

Umm, to conclude this blog post, I wanna say that us girls and women WON our own rights to vote, to have money, and to own property — so that we can be completely independent from men if we want to be. I’m lesbian and I reside completely independently, so I’m like very happy that women in the past (and girls too!!!!) made sure that I can be totally independent in the way that I am now. It used to be that women couldn’t even have their own bank accounts or anything. What I’m saying is that it was us who won our rights to do all of these things, and men didn’t give these things to us because they wanted us to have them. They were forced to accept that we won, with activism and direct actions like the women in Iceland did on 24th October 1975 in their women’s strike — and like women all around the world did to simply win the right to vote in elections and to be able to do other things like that, much earlier! The way these rich men’s groups look at things though is like they’re controlling everything like master planners and manipulators, “giving” everyone just enough rights to keep us all docile and compliant (not to keep us happy, really), so that we don’t rise up in a revolution against them. That’s why they make the CIA try to roll back feminism with attempted brainwashing of little kids viewing Nickelodeon kids’ shows, and other seriously grimy, nasty tactics like that. These rich men’s groups don’t actually care about the rights of women and girls. They are actively trying to take our rights away from us again, to send the world back to the sort of place in which only men’s rights matter… because that’s all they care about: rich men’s rights to do anything they want. They actually want us to go back to being submissive housewives. It’s not a joke. There’s no other reason for Miles saying “woman” like that to Taylor and Frankie on The Haunted Hathaways, and there’s no other reason for Nora and Phoebe both deliberately losing on purpose to male characters when they’d already won, on The Thundermans. They are trying to brainwash impressionable little kids who look to kids’ TV show characters to understand how girls and boys are supposed to behave, hoping that whatever we all want now as girls and women in 2023, that it won’t matter when all of these little kids who are still viewing Haunted Hathaways and Thundermans repeats on TV grow up! They are hoping that all of these little kids are gonna be against feminism when they grow up, and that they’re gonna outnumber us in the future!

Seriously people… we need to act now. We need to call for all women candidate lists for all stages of the United States Presidential elections, immediately! We need to do this to make sure that the status quo in the US changes so much in favour of feminism and equal rights for women and girls, that it’s gonna be extremely hard to ever change things back again to how they used to be. And we need to call for The Haunted Hathaways show on Nickelodeon to be banned, because it’s unacceptably sexist in a post-Weinstein, post-Epstein world! Pull this show from TV now, and never show it again, Nickelodeon!!!! Also, never do anything like you did with The Haunted Hathaways and The Thundermans ever again, Nickelodeon! And we know that it’s not just you doing this. Look at the first episode of Barbie Dreamhouse Adventures. 🙁 I love Barbie Dreamhouse Adventures so much, and it’s a great show for feminism in a million ways that I won’t explain now. Most of the show is nothing like the first episode AT ALL, and it’s great for little girls… but please view episode one of Barbie Dreamhouse Adventures, people, and open your eyes to what the CIA is doing in all of these shows on behalf of the rich mens’ groups, to try to roll back feminism in the future by brainwashing impressionable little kids now! Remember very little kids look at things in a simple way. Barbie’s mom is a computer programmer and she’s supposed to be very intelligent and capable, but her husband undermines her and doubts her abilities… and she doubts herself until he gives her permission on behalf of patriarchy to believe that she can be as good as a man. Then she’s written to fuck up the wiring thing and almost electrocute herself in front of her daughters, because she somehow doesn’t know which wires to reattach (even though she’s supposed to have designed the whole smart house herself, because she’s a technological genius or something). Ken also saves everyone by letting them back into the house somehow, just because he’s male or something, when the mom might have been written to get the door open. That’s the first impression of the show for anyone viewing it with a streaming service, since they’re gonna start from episode one (not like television)… so that’s probably why the CIA made sure that their agents had the female characters look like they’re never gonna be as good as men at doing anything, on a show that’s all about “You can be anything!” Girls growing up to be doctors and programmers, etc! That’s the theme of Barbie at the moment (You can be anything!) aimed at little girls, and the CIA was undermining the feminism that the other makers of Barbie are doing by making sure that the first episode of Barbie Dreamhouse Adventures was written so horribly for feminism. NOTICE THIS and make sure that you DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!! Whenever someone in society tries to push a sexist thing on you, push back and make the world be the way you want it to be for all girls and women!!!! 🙂 Be strong, because us girls can be strong too without losing our femininity. I kind of think “What does Barbie do?” if someone is sexist to her on her TV show, even with the CIA trying to write the characters badly when they can get away with it… and I think she says “I don’t agree with that! I’m not going to do what you want me to do. I’m going to do things my way, thanks! But like, thanks for your opinion!” slightly psychotic but nice smiling face (Smiling isn’t necessary, but it helps me to think of stuff like this — because Barbie is still feminine, even if she replies to people in a firm way like that.)

I am not gonna let the CIA take Barbie away from me. I can make Barbie say and do anything I want her to do, in my head, in response to like any kind of sexism and barbarity — however extreme the sexism and barbarity might be — and everything that I have Barbie say and do in my head, in response to all of that crap, is authentic. It’s all in Barbie’s voice, and it’s her personality taking all of these actions in self-defence against these monsters… because she’s not weak, and she knows that you can’t let bullies win or the world won’t ever get better! I know that Barbie can even go war if the situation calls for her to do that. I’m not being funny here, but she can do anything. She can be anything. LOL. She’s like a character who is always strong, but always feminine, tries to always do the right thing and be nice… but stops being nice if there’s no way to be nice anymore without letting bullies win. She probably cries about having to do the things she has to do to stop bullies from winning, if they’re that horrible to her that she’s forced to take extreme action herself to be OK. Barbie is never written on her TV shows to fight in wars — because that’s not the point of her stories. They’re about girls having the space to be feminine and pretty and nice, without anyone saying they can’t do things if they’re feminine and pretty and nice. The stories are about feminine girls being able to do all the things they might ever want to do; not about girls being forced to do stuff that, like, they don’t wanna do, ever!!!! That’s not my point I’m making though. I’m saying that never, ever, ever is Barbie gonna be written to say she gives in to bullies and lets them win. The TV show creators simply don’t write her into the horrible situations in which she has to go to war against bullies, defeating them using whatever means she has to use in the end to stop bullies from winning. But it’s obvious from what she IS written to do, in the stories she actually stars in, that Barbie is a winner and not a loser… so she’s never gonna give in to bullies and let them win, meaning whatever she says and does in these extreme situations I’ve visualised her in are all authentic Barbie behaviours. She believes that everyone can be a winner, and wants things to work out like that — but she’s gonna choose herself being OK, and not bulllies being OK, if it’s a zero-sum choice being forced on her!

So please, do what I do when I ask every shop assistant who ever calls me “love” and “darling” and “sweetie” to kindly not call me that in client-servant dynamics — because, as I say to them if there’s like, the time and the opportunity to explain my reasons for reacting that way to what they said: I’m a feminist, and I seriously don’t like it that big men tend to get called nothing, or “sir”, by shop assistants and paid servants of all kinds… whereas small girls and women like me tend to get called all of these minimising, allegedly “well-meant” names implying familiarity, as if we’re lovers or I’m their daughter that they can call whatever they want, as if I’m inferior to them. I explain to them that I respect them as paid servants in this dynamic, and I don’t act as if I’m better than they are, just because they’re being paid to serve me — so I want them to respect me too. I say to them, if there’s time, that maybe if some women routinely call ALL people of any gender these allegedly “well-meant” names implying familiarity, then maybe it’s like, because they secretly feel resentment at the way girls and women are treated as second class inferior beings in patriarchy and they want to continue this cycle of minimising people by not respecting them properly, assuming familiarity where there is none… using the excuse that it’s a sort of feminine culture, or local custom, or all sorts of other excuses for minimising others in a passive-aggressive way instead of attacking and overthrowing the patriarchy that minimises them! They ought to attack and overthrow the patriarchy that makes them feel the need to minimise others in this passive-aggressive way! This is what I say to them in the politest, nicest way I can, without being weak. I choose to be strong and make sure I don’t let people treat me in ways that I don’t wanna be treated!

Please call for all women candidate lists for all stages of the United States Presidential elections, immediately, even though it feels radical and aggressive to call for something like that when you expect a lot of people to be hostile to the idea. You know yourself that it’s right for a woman to be President of the USA by this point in the USA’s existence. So know the truth that calling for such extreme measures IS JUSTIFIED AND RIGHT, and YOU ARE BEING NICE by saying this loudly and clearly. Because letting bullies win isn’t nice. What does Barbie do? Does she say — after hoping that people just choose to vote for a woman president without having to be forced to choose from only women, and that never happening — “Well I guess we can’t ever have a woman President of the USA, then!” I can’t hear the character ever saying those words. So do what Barbie does, if she’s put in the appropriate situation. The appropriate high school debate, or whatever situation she needs to be in, to call for all women candidate lists for all stages of the United States Presidential elections, immediately. 🙂

And call for the whole TV series, The Haunted Hathaways, to be banned from being shown on TV ever again, forever!

I hope you all enjoyed reading my latest blog entry, people. It’s long and repetitive in areas, but it’s necessary, you know? We need change, now. Not later. Now! How else to say this? If people don’t wanna listen, you have to beat them over the head with the same ideas until they listen! And take direct actions at every place you can.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Remarkable things here. I’m very happy to see your article.
    Thank you a lot aand I’m having a loook ahead to contact you.
    Wiill you please drop me a e-mail?

  2. Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve undertand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely excellent.
    I really lie what you have acquired here, certainly liie what you’restating and the way in which you
    sayy it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to kee it smart.
    I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site.

    1. Hey, what do you mean? I seriously don’t get it! 🙂

      I think I can receive PMs. I don’t know if there’s a setting for that or something. Anyone can comment or PM me, I think.